Knowledge · Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Nano on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Gemini 3 Flash Nano scores 71.4 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #386 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
71.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#386
of 600
Percentile
36th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
20.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Gemini 3 Flash Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Gemini 3 Flash Nano sits at #386 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 20.2 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Gemini 3 Flash Nano below the midpoint.

Google DeepMind models average 80.4 on this benchmark. Gemini 3 Flash Nano is 9.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Google DeepMind model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Gemini 3 Flash Nano is 0.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.56 per million input tokens, Gemini 3 Flash Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Firesearch Max Fireworks AI 8192 $7.80 69.9
Grok 3 Nano xAI 8192 $7.12 67.8
Firesearch Fireworks AI 32768 $7.03 68.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.28 69.2
Gemini 3 Flash Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.56 69.4
StableLM 2 Stability AI 8192 $1.91 65.0
Sonar Mini Perplexity 65536 $6.52 67.9

Other benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 62.9 384 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.7 379 37th
HumanEval 73.0 372 38th
MATH-500 75.0 323 46th
AIME 2025 62.9 365 39th
LiveCodeBench 60.3 364 39th
IFEval 77.5 371 38th
TruthfulQA 72.0 379 37th
HellaSwag 83.4 308 49th
MMMU 69.5 316 47th
Arena Elo 1348.8 367 39th

FAQ

What score does Gemini 3 Flash Nano get on MMLU-Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash Nano scores 71.4 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Gemini 3 Flash Nano rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #386 of 600 models, in the 36th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Nano good at MMLU-Pro?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Gemini 3 Flash Nano cost?

Gemini 3 Flash Nano costs $7.56 per million input tokens and $41.55 per million output tokens.

Related