Commonsense · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 8B on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 8B scores 73.4 on HellaSwag, placing it #470 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
73.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#470
of 600
Percentile
22th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
22.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with GLM-4.5 8B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, GLM-4.5 8B sits at #470 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 22.7 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts GLM-4.5 8B below the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 81.9 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 8B is 8.5 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 70.2. GLM-4.5 8B is 3.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.46 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 8B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Anyscale 8B Anyscale 32768 $0.97 57.3
Llama 3 Novita 8B Novita AI 16384 $0.99 55.5
Mistral Small 3 8B Mistral AI 8192 $0.99 57.2
QwQ 7B Alibaba Cloud 8192 $1.11 58.1
GLM-4.5 8B Zhipu AI 32768 $1.46 61.3
GPT-NeoX Chat EleutherAI 16384 $1.49 60.1
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 8B Cerebras 32768 $1.02 58.2

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5 8B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 64.2 465 23th
GPQA Diamond 54.3 476 21th
SWE-bench Verified 48.4 434 28th
HumanEval 64.6 445 26th
MATH-500 64.4 422 30th
AIME 2025 53.7 427 29th
LiveCodeBench 53.7 414 31th
IFEval 72.5 425 29th
TruthfulQA 67.5 424 29th
MMMU 57.3 464 23th
Arena Elo 1269.0 462 23th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 8B get on HellaSwag?

GLM-4.5 8B scores 73.4 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does GLM-4.5 8B rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #470 of 600 models, in the 22nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is GLM-4.5 8B good at HellaSwag?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 8B cost?

GLM-4.5 8B costs $1.46 per million input tokens and $6.70 per million output tokens.

Related