Coding · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 scores 73.0 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #127 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
73.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#127
of 600
Percentile
79th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
12.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with GLM-4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, GLM-4.5 sits at #127 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 12.1 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts GLM-4.5 above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 61.8 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 is 11.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 70.3. GLM-4.5 is 2.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.55 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
MiniMax-Text Chat MiniMax 128000 $4.26 77.8
Command A Max Cohere 400000 $14.28 79.9
DeepSeek-V3.2 Base DeepSeek 128000 $5.05 80.2
ERNIE 4.5 Max Baidu 128000 $14.41 80.6
GLM-4.5 Zhipu AI 200000 $4.55 78.2
Mistral Large 3 Chat Mistral AI 1000000 $4.90 79.1
Reka Core Reasoning Reka AI 32768 $13.11 78.5

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 78.8 215 64th
GPQA Diamond 74.9 147 76th
SWE-bench Verified 66.4 181 70th
HumanEval 81.6 193 68th
MATH-500 81.7 170 72th
AIME 2025 76.0 141 77th
IFEval 85.8 164 73th
TruthfulQA 79.7 193 68th
HellaSwag 88.8 117 81th
MMMU 73.9 194 68th
Arena Elo 1414.6 169 72th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 get on LiveCodeBench?

GLM-4.5 scores 73.0 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does GLM-4.5 rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #127 of 600 models, in the 79th percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is GLM-4.5 good at LiveCodeBench?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 cost?

GLM-4.5 costs $4.55 per million input tokens and $20.60 per million output tokens.

Related