Hunyuan-Large Chat on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means
Hunyuan-Large Chat scores 80.3 on TruthfulQA, placing it #170 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Hunyuan-Large Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.1 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $20.50 | 87.9 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 3 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 4 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.71 | 88.0 |
| 6 | Gemini 3 Pro Max | Google DeepMind | 2000000 | $20.57 | 87.9 |
| 7 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 8 | Qwen3-Max Max | Alibaba Cloud | 400000 | $18.53 | 85.9 |
| 9 | GPT-5.1 | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.01 | 86.0 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Turbo | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.19 | 86.1 |
What this score means
On TruthfulQA, Hunyuan-Large Chat sits at #170 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 10.8 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Hunyuan-Large Chat above the midpoint.
Tencent models average 74.1 on this benchmark. Hunyuan-Large Chat is 6.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Tencent model.
Among multimodal models, the average is 80.1. Hunyuan-Large Chat is 0.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 80.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $4.35 per million input tokens, Hunyuan-Large Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 Cerebras | Cerebras | 128000 | $4.01 | 76.0 |
| Llama 3.3 | Meta AI | 128000 | $4.56 | 78.2 |
| Qwen3 | Alibaba Cloud | 128000 | $5.04 | 80.3 |
| Qwen3-Max Mini | Alibaba Cloud | 128000 | $11.13 | 76.5 |
| Hunyuan-Large Chat | Tencent | 200000 | $4.35 | 78.1 |
| Kimi K1.5 Chat | Moonshot AI | 128000 | $5.11 | 80.2 |
| MiniMax-M2 Chat | MiniMax | 200000 | $5.02 | 80.2 |
Other benchmarks for Hunyuan-Large Chat
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.6 | 164 | 73th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.4 | 135 | 78th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.3 | 185 | 69th | |
| HumanEval | 83.5 | 145 | 76th | |
| MATH-500 | 83.3 | 141 | 77th | |
| AIME 2025 | 70.4 | 250 | 58th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 73.8 | 112 | 81th | |
| IFEval | 84.3 | 206 | 66th | |
| HellaSwag | 86.9 | 181 | 70th | |
| MMMU | 74.0 | 191 | 68th | |
| Arena Elo | 1413.8 | 174 | 71th |
FAQ
What score does Hunyuan-Large Chat get on TruthfulQA?
Hunyuan-Large Chat scores 80.3 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.
How does Hunyuan-Large Chat rank on TruthfulQA?
It ranks #170 of 600 models, in the 72nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.
Is Hunyuan-Large Chat good at TruthfulQA?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?
TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Hunyuan-Large Chat cost?
Hunyuan-Large Chat costs $4.35 per million input tokens and $18.20 per million output tokens.