Multimodal · Cerebras

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B scores 48.0 on MMMU, placing it #564 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
48.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#564
of 600
Percentile
6th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
38.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B sits at #564 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 38.9 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B below the midpoint.

Cerebras models average 62.9 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B is 14.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cerebras model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 52.4. Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B is 4.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 48.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.48 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Yi-Lightning 1.5B 01.AI 4096 $0.54 50.0
Gemma 3 1.5B Google DeepMind 32768 $0.40 48.9
DBRX 7B Databricks 8192 $0.65 51.9
DBRX 1.5B Databricks 16384 $0.32 47.0
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B Cerebras 4096 $0.48 50.2
Mistral Small 3 1.5B Mistral AI 32768 $0.42 49.2
StableLM 2 8B Stability AI 32768 $0.38 47.0

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 57.5 554 8th
GPQA Diamond 46.0 558 7th
SWE-bench Verified 36.6 544 9th
HumanEval 52.4 557 7th
MATH-500 48.7 568 5th
AIME 2025 38.1 549 9th
LiveCodeBench 39.6 540 10th
IFEval 61.5 560 7th
TruthfulQA 55.6 571 5th
HellaSwag 68.6 552 8th
Arena Elo 1198.1 557 7th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B get on MMMU?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B scores 48.0 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B rank on MMMU?

It ranks #564 of 600 models, in the 6th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B cost?

Llama 3.1 Cerebras 1.5B costs $0.48 per million input tokens and $2.46 per million output tokens.

Related