Reasoning · Together AI

Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B scores 51.9 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #500 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
51.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#500
of 600
Percentile
17th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
35.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B sits at #500 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 35.1 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B below the midpoint.

Together AI models average 60.8 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B is 8.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Together AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 49.3. Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B is 2.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 51.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.98 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Embed 4 Mini Cohere 4096 $2.48 55.8
Mistral Large 3 1.5B Mistral AI 32768 $0.82 55.4
Mixtral 8B Mistral AI 8192 $0.91 55.4
Yi-Large 8B 01.AI 32768 $0.88 56.1
Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B Together AI 8192 $0.98 56.4
Mistral Small 3 8B Mistral AI 8192 $0.99 57.2
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B Cerebras 32768 $0.95 56.5

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 63.8 474 21th
SWE-bench Verified 43.8 481 20th
HumanEval 59.0 512 15th
MATH-500 55.8 510 15th
AIME 2025 44.6 501 17th
LiveCodeBench 44.2 506 16th
IFEval 65.9 520 13th
TruthfulQA 63.0 491 18th
HellaSwag 72.0 499 17th
MMMU 56.7 476 21th
Arena Elo 1245.4 497 17th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B get on GPQA Diamond?

Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B scores 51.9 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #500 of 600 models, in the 17th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B good at GPQA Diamond?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B cost?

Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B costs $0.98 per million input tokens and $4.14 per million output tokens.

Related