Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means
Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B scores 55.8 on MATH-500, placing it #510 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 3 | GPT-5.1 Pro | OpenAI | 200000 | $19.77 | 87.8 |
| 4 | o4 Reasoning | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 5 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 6 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $20.90 | 87.8 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 9 | Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo | Anthropic | 2000000 | $19.57 | 85.7 |
What this score means
On MATH-500, Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B sits at #510 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 40.9 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B below the midpoint.
Together AI models average 66.4 on this benchmark. Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B is 10.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Together AI model.
Among small open-weight models, the average is 53.7. Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B is 2.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 55.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $0.98 per million input tokens, Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3 Hyperbolic 8B | Hyperbolic | 16384 | $0.92 | 56.0 |
| Llama 3 Replicate 7B | Replicate | 32768 | $0.91 | 56.0 |
| DBRX 8B | Databricks | 4096 | $0.82 | 54.1 |
| Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B | Cerebras | 32768 | $0.95 | 56.5 |
| Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B | Together AI | 8192 | $0.98 | 56.4 |
| Llama 3 Baseten 7B | Baseten | 32768 | $0.87 | 55.3 |
| Pythia Base | EleutherAI | 16384 | $0.99 | 55.9 |
Other benchmarks for Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 63.8 | 474 | 21th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 51.9 | 500 | 17th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 43.8 | 481 | 20th | |
| HumanEval | 59.0 | 512 | 15th | |
| AIME 2025 | 44.6 | 501 | 17th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 44.2 | 506 | 16th | |
| IFEval | 65.9 | 520 | 13th | |
| TruthfulQA | 63.0 | 491 | 18th | |
| HellaSwag | 72.0 | 499 | 17th | |
| MMMU | 56.7 | 476 | 21th | |
| Arena Elo | 1245.4 | 497 | 17th |
FAQ
What score does Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B get on MATH-500?
Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B scores 55.8 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.
How does Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B rank on MATH-500?
It ranks #510 of 600 models, in the 15th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.
Is Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B good at MATH-500?
It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the MATH-500 score calculated?
MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B cost?
Llama 3.1 Turbo 7B costs $0.98 per million input tokens and $4.14 per million output tokens.