Instruction following · Groq

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct scores 85.7 on IFEval, placing it #167 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
85.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#167
of 600
Percentile
72th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
10.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct sits at #167 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 10.4 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct above the midpoint.

Groq models average 74.3 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct is 11.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Groq model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 85.2. Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct is 0.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 85.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.08 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DeepSeek-Coder Chat DeepSeek 200000 $4.20 77.3
GLM-4.5 Zhipu AI 200000 $4.55 78.2
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Instruct Cerebras 65536 $4.11 76.1
Yi-Lightning 01.AI 32768 $4.22 77.2
Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct Groq 65536 $4.08 76.7
Qwen3-Coder Base Alibaba Cloud 200000 $3.99 76.6
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.2 142 76th
GPQA Diamond 74.0 169 72th
SWE-bench Verified 65.1 212 65th
HumanEval 79.6 246 59th
MATH-500 79.3 227 62th
AIME 2025 74.7 160 73th
LiveCodeBench 66.5 265 56th
TruthfulQA 79.7 195 68th
HellaSwag 84.8 257 57th
MMMU 73.5 205 66th
Arena Elo 1394.0 234 61th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct get on IFEval?

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct scores 85.7 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct rank on IFEval?

It ranks #167 of 600 models, in the 72nd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct good at IFEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct cost?

Llama 3.3 Groq Instruct costs $4.08 per million input tokens and $22.27 per million output tokens.

Related