Mathematics · Meta AI

Llama 3.3 Instruct on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Instruct scores 76.9 on AIME 2025, placing it #131 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
76.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#131
of 600
Percentile
78th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
14.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Llama 3.3 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Llama 3.3 Instruct sits at #131 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 14.5 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Llama 3.3 Instruct above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 62.6 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Instruct is 14.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.9. Llama 3.3 Instruct is 3.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.33 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning Baidu 65536 $12.20 77.8
GPT-4.1 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $14.88 82.0
Command A Turbo Cohere 32768 $13.53 79.8
Hunyuan-Large Instruct Tencent 65536 $4.39 78.2
Llama 3.3 Instruct Meta AI 128000 $4.33 76.6
Llama 4 Scout Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.66 78.0
Hunyuan-Turbo Max Tencent 128000 $12.40 78.3

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.7 254 58th
GPQA Diamond 70.1 257 57th
SWE-bench Verified 63.7 239 60th
HumanEval 82.1 185 69th
MATH-500 81.9 168 72th
LiveCodeBench 67.1 247 59th
IFEval 85.4 176 71th
TruthfulQA 79.0 219 64th
HellaSwag 86.9 182 70th
MMMU 72.0 245 59th
Arena Elo 1418.0 157 74th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Instruct get on AIME 2025?

Llama 3.3 Instruct scores 76.9 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Llama 3.3 Instruct rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #131 of 600 models, in the 78th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Llama 3.3 Instruct good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Instruct cost?

Llama 3.3 Instruct costs $4.33 per million input tokens and $19.59 per million output tokens.

Related