Preference · Meta AI

Llama 3.3 Instruct on Arena Elo: score, rank and what it means

Llama 3.3 Instruct scores 1418.0 on Arena Elo, placing it #157 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Score
1418.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#157
of 600
Percentile
74th
within the index
Benchmark avg
1349.9
all models
Leader
1501.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max
Gap to leader
83.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on Arena Elo, with Llama 3.3 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Max 1501.9
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 1500.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 1500.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 1497.5
GPT-5.2 Max 1495.3
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 1494.9
Grok 4 Max 1491.4
Claude Opus 4.5 1491.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 1490.0
Grok 4 Reasoning 1487.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
2 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
3 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
6 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
7 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
10 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8

What this score means

On Arena Elo, Llama 3.3 Instruct sits at #157 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Max, scores 1501.9, so the gap to the top is 83.9 points. The median model in this index scores 1373.8, which puts Llama 3.3 Instruct above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 1342.5 on this benchmark. Llama 3.3 Instruct is 75.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 1409.6. Llama 3.3 Instruct is 8.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 1418.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.33 per million input tokens, Llama 3.3 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on Arena Elo. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Qwen3 Instruct Alibaba Cloud 1000000 $5.06 79.8
Qwen3-Coder Instruct Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.66 78.1
GLM-4.5 Chat Zhipu AI 65536 $4.53 78.3
ERNIE 4.0 Pro Baidu 200000 $12.58 77.5
Llama 3.3 Instruct Meta AI 128000 $4.33 76.6
DeepSeek-V3.2 Base DeepSeek 128000 $5.05 80.2
Reka Core Max Reka AI 128000 $13.41 79.3

Other benchmarks for Llama 3.3 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.7 254 58th
GPQA Diamond 70.1 257 57th
SWE-bench Verified 63.7 239 60th
HumanEval 82.1 185 69th
MATH-500 81.9 168 72th
AIME 2025 76.9 131 78th
LiveCodeBench 67.1 247 59th
IFEval 85.4 176 71th
TruthfulQA 79.0 219 64th
HellaSwag 86.9 182 70th
MMMU 72.0 245 59th

FAQ

What score does Llama 3.3 Instruct get on Arena Elo?

Llama 3.3 Instruct scores 1418.0 on Arena Elo in this index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the top score is 1501.9.

How does Llama 3.3 Instruct rank on Arena Elo?

It ranks #157 of 600 models, in the 74th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Is Llama 3.3 Instruct good at Arena Elo?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the Arena Elo score calculated?

Arena Elo is a preference benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 3.3 Instruct cost?

Llama 3.3 Instruct costs $4.33 per million input tokens and $19.59 per million output tokens.

Related