Reasoning · Meta AI

Llama 4 Maverick Base on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Llama 4 Maverick Base scores 71.8 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #224 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
71.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#224
of 600
Percentile
63th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
15.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Llama 4 Maverick Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Llama 4 Maverick Base sits at #224 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 15.2 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Llama 4 Maverick Base above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 64.6 on this benchmark. Llama 4 Maverick Base is 7.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Llama 4 Maverick Base is 1.7 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.68 per million input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick Base is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.1 Turbo Together AI 200000 $4.17 76.8
Llama 3 Modal Instruct Modal 128000 $3.84 75.2
o3 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.68 76.2
Llama 3.1 Instruct Meta AI 200000 $4.05 75.7
Llama 4 Maverick Base Meta AI 128000 $4.68 79.1
ERNIE 4.0 Pro Baidu 200000 $12.58 77.5
Llama 3 DeepInfra Instruct DeepInfra 65536 $3.84 75.5

Other benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.3 100 83th
SWE-bench Verified 67.9 148 75th
HumanEval 85.4 107 82th
MATH-500 83.3 142 76th
AIME 2025 77.8 117 81th
LiveCodeBench 69.3 203 66th
IFEval 87.4 122 80th
TruthfulQA 81.2 150 75th
HellaSwag 89.2 109 82th
MMMU 73.8 197 67th
Arena Elo 1425.2 129 79th

FAQ

What score does Llama 4 Maverick Base get on GPQA Diamond?

Llama 4 Maverick Base scores 71.8 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Llama 4 Maverick Base rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #224 of 600 models, in the 63rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Llama 4 Maverick Base good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 4 Maverick Base cost?

Llama 4 Maverick Base costs $4.68 per million input tokens and $21.03 per million output tokens.

Related