Knowledge · Meta AI

Llama 4 Maverick Base on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Llama 4 Maverick Base scores 83.3 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #100 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
83.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#100
of 600
Percentile
83th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
8.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Llama 4 Maverick Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Llama 4 Maverick Base sits at #100 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 8.3 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Llama 4 Maverick Base above the midpoint.

Meta AI models average 73.0 on this benchmark. Llama 4 Maverick Base is 10.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Meta AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.0. Llama 4 Maverick Base is 3.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.68 per million input tokens, Llama 4 Maverick Base is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude Haiku 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 128000 $15.11 81.4
DeepSeek-R1 Chat DeepSeek 400000 $5.62 82.4
Qwen3 Chat Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.75 79.1
Kimi K2 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.85 83.0
Llama 4 Maverick Base Meta AI 128000 $4.68 79.1
Mistral Large 3 Chat Mistral AI 1000000 $4.90 79.1
Reka Core Pro Reka AI 65536 $13.44 79.9

Other benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 71.8 224 63th
SWE-bench Verified 67.9 148 75th
HumanEval 85.4 107 82th
MATH-500 83.3 142 76th
AIME 2025 77.8 117 81th
LiveCodeBench 69.3 203 66th
IFEval 87.4 122 80th
TruthfulQA 81.2 150 75th
HellaSwag 89.2 109 82th
MMMU 73.8 197 67th
Arena Elo 1425.2 129 79th

FAQ

What score does Llama 4 Maverick Base get on MMLU-Pro?

Llama 4 Maverick Base scores 83.3 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Llama 4 Maverick Base rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #100 of 600 models, in the 83rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Llama 4 Maverick Base good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Llama 4 Maverick Base cost?

Llama 4 Maverick Base costs $4.68 per million input tokens and $21.03 per million output tokens.

Related