Mathematics · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 7B on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 7B scores 60.3 on MATH-500, placing it #458 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
60.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#458
of 600
Percentile
24th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
36.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with MiniMax-M2 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, MiniMax-M2 7B sits at #458 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 36.4 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts MiniMax-M2 7B below the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 71.1 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 7B is 10.8 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average MiniMax model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 53.7. MiniMax-M2 7B is 6.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 60.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.44 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nova Lite Nano Amazon 8192 $3.29 59.5
QwQ 7B Alibaba Cloud 8192 $1.11 58.1
QwQ 8B Alibaba Cloud 16384 $1.37 59.5
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 8B Cerebras 32768 $1.02 58.2
MiniMax-M2 7B MiniMax 8192 $1.44 60.8
Llama 3 Anyscale 8B Anyscale 32768 $0.97 57.3
Yi-Lightning 8B 01.AI 4096 $1.16 59.2

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 64.1 469 22th
GPQA Diamond 56.2 447 26th
SWE-bench Verified 45.5 460 23th
HumanEval 66.8 423 30th
AIME 2025 54.0 424 29th
LiveCodeBench 50.2 447 26th
IFEval 72.1 429 29th
TruthfulQA 66.1 443 26th
HellaSwag 74.5 450 25th
MMMU 58.9 442 26th
Arena Elo 1280.9 444 26th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 7B get on MATH-500?

MiniMax-M2 7B scores 60.3 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does MiniMax-M2 7B rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #458 of 600 models, in the 24th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is MiniMax-M2 7B good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 7B cost?

MiniMax-M2 7B costs $1.44 per million input tokens and $7.00 per million output tokens.

Related