Knowledge · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 7B on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 7B scores 64.1 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #469 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
64.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#469
of 600
Percentile
22th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
27.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with MiniMax-M2 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, MiniMax-M2 7B sits at #469 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 27.5 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts MiniMax-M2 7B below the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 72.7 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 7B is 8.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average MiniMax model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.8. MiniMax-M2 7B is 4.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.44 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.5 8B Zhipu AI 32768 $1.46 61.3
Qwen3 7B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $1.37 59.8
Gemma 3 8B Google DeepMind 16384 $0.96 56.5
Hunyuan-Large 8B Tencent 4096 $1.29 58.7
MiniMax-M2 7B MiniMax 8192 $1.44 60.8
Firefunction Nano Fireworks AI 16384 $3.07 58.1
Hunyuan-Large 7B Tencent 32768 $1.08 57.7

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 56.2 447 26th
SWE-bench Verified 45.5 460 23th
HumanEval 66.8 423 30th
MATH-500 60.3 458 24th
AIME 2025 54.0 424 29th
LiveCodeBench 50.2 447 26th
IFEval 72.1 429 29th
TruthfulQA 66.1 443 26th
HellaSwag 74.5 450 25th
MMMU 58.9 442 26th
Arena Elo 1280.9 444 26th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 7B get on MMLU-Pro?

MiniMax-M2 7B scores 64.1 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does MiniMax-M2 7B rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #469 of 600 models, in the 22nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is MiniMax-M2 7B good at MMLU-Pro?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 7B cost?

MiniMax-M2 7B costs $1.44 per million input tokens and $7.00 per million output tokens.

Related