Commonsense · MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 Instruct on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

MiniMax-M2 Instruct scores 88.5 on HellaSwag, placing it #125 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
88.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#125
of 600
Percentile
79th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
7.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with MiniMax-M2 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, MiniMax-M2 Instruct sits at #125 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 7.6 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts MiniMax-M2 Instruct above the midpoint.

MiniMax models average 81.3 on this benchmark. MiniMax-M2 Instruct is 7.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average MiniMax model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. MiniMax-M2 Instruct is 1.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 88.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.11 per million input tokens, MiniMax-M2 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Core Pro Reka AI 65536 $13.44 79.9
Sonar Pro Pro Perplexity 200000 $13.59 79.7
Claude Haiku 4.5 Vision Anthropic 128000 $13.01 79.2
Kimi K2 Base Moonshot AI 65536 $4.82 79.2
MiniMax-M2 Instruct MiniMax 128000 $5.11 79.4
Llama 3.3 Meta AI 128000 $4.56 78.2
Llama 4 Scout Instruct Meta AI 32768 $4.59 79.1

Other benchmarks for MiniMax-M2 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 82.1 121 80th
GPQA Diamond 73.7 178 70th
SWE-bench Verified 69.9 113 81th
HumanEval 86.7 95 84th
MATH-500 82.1 165 73th
AIME 2025 77.8 118 80th
LiveCodeBench 71.1 170 72th
IFEval 87.3 126 79th
TruthfulQA 80.0 178 70th
MMMU 74.1 189 69th
Arena Elo 1442.2 95 84th

FAQ

What score does MiniMax-M2 Instruct get on HellaSwag?

MiniMax-M2 Instruct scores 88.5 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does MiniMax-M2 Instruct rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #125 of 600 models, in the 79th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is MiniMax-M2 Instruct good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does MiniMax-M2 Instruct cost?

MiniMax-M2 Instruct costs $5.11 per million input tokens and $25.04 per million output tokens.

Related