Instruction following · Microsoft

Phi-3.5 Base on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Phi-3.5 Base scores 74.2 on IFEval, placing it #404 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
74.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#404
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
21.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Phi-3.5 Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Phi-3.5 Base sits at #404 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 21.9 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Phi-3.5 Base below the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 72.4 on this benchmark. Phi-3.5 Base is 1.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 77.0. Phi-3.5 Base is 2.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 74.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.24 per million input tokens, Phi-3.5 Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
StableLM 2 Chat Stability AI 8192 $1.79 64.6
Reka Core Nano Reka AI 16384 $5.45 65.1
Nemotron Nano NVIDIA 8192 $2.24 66.6
Nemotron Nano Chat NVIDIA 32768 $2.21 66.2
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6
Nova Pro Nano Amazon 8192 $5.44 65.4
SmolLM3 Instruct Hugging Face 8192 $1.69 63.6

Other benchmarks for Phi-3.5 Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.4 379 37th
GPQA Diamond 60.3 402 33th
SWE-bench Verified 51.6 409 32th
HumanEval 73.1 371 38th
MATH-500 71.6 373 38th
AIME 2025 59.7 389 35th
LiveCodeBench 55.2 401 33th
TruthfulQA 73.0 370 38th
HellaSwag 79.5 389 35th
MMMU 61.7 412 31th
Arena Elo 1315.0 400 33th

FAQ

What score does Phi-3.5 Base get on IFEval?

Phi-3.5 Base scores 74.2 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Phi-3.5 Base rank on IFEval?

It ranks #404 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Phi-3.5 Base good at IFEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-3.5 Base cost?

Phi-3.5 Base costs $2.24 per million input tokens and $10.25 per million output tokens.

Related