Multimodal · Microsoft

Phi-3.5 Base on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Phi-3.5 Base scores 61.7 on MMMU, placing it #412 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
61.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#412
of 600
Percentile
31th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
25.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Phi-3.5 Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Phi-3.5 Base sits at #412 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 25.2 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Phi-3.5 Base below the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 59.7 on this benchmark. Phi-3.5 Base is 2.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 65.1. Phi-3.5 Base is 3.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 61.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.24 per million input tokens, Phi-3.5 Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Zephyr Hugging Face 8192 $1.61 62.8
Nova Lite Mini Amazon 16384 $5.43 65.0
DeepSeek-R1 7B DeepSeek 32768 $1.79 63.0
Reka Core Nano Reka AI 16384 $5.45 65.1
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
ERNIE 4.0 Nano Baidu 32768 $4.68 62.1

Other benchmarks for Phi-3.5 Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.4 379 37th
GPQA Diamond 60.3 402 33th
SWE-bench Verified 51.6 409 32th
HumanEval 73.1 371 38th
MATH-500 71.6 373 38th
AIME 2025 59.7 389 35th
LiveCodeBench 55.2 401 33th
IFEval 74.2 404 33th
TruthfulQA 73.0 370 38th
HellaSwag 79.5 389 35th
Arena Elo 1315.0 400 33th

FAQ

What score does Phi-3.5 Base get on MMMU?

Phi-3.5 Base scores 61.7 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Phi-3.5 Base rank on MMMU?

It ranks #412 of 600 models, in the 31st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Phi-3.5 Base good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-3.5 Base cost?

Phi-3.5 Base costs $2.24 per million input tokens and $10.25 per million output tokens.

Related