Multimodal · Microsoft

Phi-3.5 on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Phi-3.5 scores 68.8 on MMMU, placing it #328 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
68.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#328
of 600
Percentile
45th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
18.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Phi-3.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Phi-3.5 sits at #328 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 18.1 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Phi-3.5 below the midpoint.

Microsoft models average 59.7 on this benchmark. Phi-3.5 is 9.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Microsoft model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 65.1. Phi-3.5 is 3.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 68.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.81 per million input tokens, Phi-3.5 is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DBRX Base Databricks 32768 $2.63 69.1
DeepSeek-Coder Base DeepSeek 32768 $3.53 74.1
OLMo 2 Chat Allen Institute for AI 16384 $2.94 70.6
Llama 3 Modal Base Modal 16384 $3.21 72.2
Phi-3.5 Microsoft 16384 $2.81 70.9
Doubao 1.5 Pro Mini ByteDance 32768 $8.30 72.3
Firesearch Pro Fireworks AI 32768 $7.67 70.4

Other benchmarks for Phi-3.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.1 304 49th
GPQA Diamond 67.0 331 45th
SWE-bench Verified 60.9 308 49th
HumanEval 76.2 327 46th
MATH-500 75.4 316 47th
AIME 2025 60.6 383 36th
LiveCodeBench 59.8 371 38th
IFEval 77.1 377 37th
TruthfulQA 74.8 336 44th
HellaSwag 82.9 323 46th
Arena Elo 1356.7 350 42th

FAQ

What score does Phi-3.5 get on MMMU?

Phi-3.5 scores 68.8 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Phi-3.5 rank on MMMU?

It ranks #328 of 600 models, in the 45th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Phi-3.5 good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Phi-3.5 cost?

Phi-3.5 costs $2.81 per million input tokens and $14.99 per million output tokens.

Related