Multimodal · Perplexity

Sonar Reasoning on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Reasoning scores 71.5 on MMMU, placing it #260 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
71.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#260
of 600
Percentile
57th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
15.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Sonar Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Sonar Reasoning sits at #260 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 15.4 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Sonar Reasoning above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 71.2 on this benchmark. Sonar Reasoning is 0.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. Sonar Reasoning is 2.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $11.48 per million input tokens, Sonar Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 Novita Chat Novita AI 65536 $3.50 74.2
Llama 4 Scout Base Meta AI 32768 $3.95 75.3
Mixtral Turbo Together AI 65536 $3.20 72.4
Sonar Pro Perplexity 65536 $11.25 77.1
Sonar Reasoning Perplexity 200000 $11.48 76.2
Firefunction Max Fireworks AI 32768 $9.12 73.2
Fusion Pro OpenRouter 65536 $8.69 72.2

Other benchmarks for Sonar Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.8 284 53th
GPQA Diamond 74.6 152 75th
SWE-bench Verified 64.6 220 63th
HumanEval 79.2 261 57th
MATH-500 80.4 202 66th
AIME 2025 70.9 239 60th
LiveCodeBench 71.2 166 72th
IFEval 85.1 189 69th
TruthfulQA 78.0 254 58th
HellaSwag 86.2 210 65th
Arena Elo 1404.5 196 67th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Reasoning get on MMMU?

Sonar Reasoning scores 71.5 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Sonar Reasoning rank on MMMU?

It ranks #260 of 600 models, in the 57th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Sonar Reasoning good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Reasoning cost?

Sonar Reasoning costs $11.48 per million input tokens and $62.24 per million output tokens.

Related