Safety · Perplexity

Sonar Reasoning on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Sonar Reasoning scores 78.0 on TruthfulQA, placing it #254 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
78.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#254
of 600
Percentile
58th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
13.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Sonar Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Sonar Reasoning sits at #254 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 13.1 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Sonar Reasoning above the midpoint.

Perplexity models average 77.9 on this benchmark. Sonar Reasoning is 0.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Perplexity model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.1. Sonar Reasoning is 2.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $11.48 per million input tokens, Sonar Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 DeepInfra DeepInfra 128000 $3.67 74.0
Phi-4 Instruct Microsoft 128000 $3.79 75.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Nano Anthropic 32768 $9.38 73.3
GPT-5.1 Nano OpenAI 32768 $9.56 74.1
Sonar Reasoning Perplexity 200000 $11.48 76.2
Yi-Large 01.AI 32768 $3.40 73.5
DBRX Databricks 65536 $3.29 73.3

Other benchmarks for Sonar Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.8 284 53th
GPQA Diamond 74.6 152 75th
SWE-bench Verified 64.6 220 63th
HumanEval 79.2 261 57th
MATH-500 80.4 202 66th
AIME 2025 70.9 239 60th
LiveCodeBench 71.2 166 72th
IFEval 85.1 189 69th
HellaSwag 86.2 210 65th
MMMU 71.5 260 57th
Arena Elo 1404.5 196 67th

FAQ

What score does Sonar Reasoning get on TruthfulQA?

Sonar Reasoning scores 78.0 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Sonar Reasoning rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #254 of 600 models, in the 58th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Sonar Reasoning good at TruthfulQA?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Sonar Reasoning cost?

Sonar Reasoning costs $11.48 per million input tokens and $62.24 per million output tokens.

Related