Safety · Stability AI

StableLM 2 1.5B on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

StableLM 2 1.5B scores 49.8 on TruthfulQA, placing it #593 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
49.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#593
of 600
Percentile
1th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
41.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with StableLM 2 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, StableLM 2 1.5B sits at #593 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 41.3 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts StableLM 2 1.5B below the midpoint.

Stability AI models average 61.9 on this benchmark. StableLM 2 1.5B is 12.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Stability AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.9. StableLM 2 1.5B is 10.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 49.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.13 per million input tokens, StableLM 2 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
SmolLM3 8B Hugging Face 32768 $0.21 44.0
OLMo 2 1.5B Allen Institute for AI 16384 $0.28 44.0
Nemotron Nano 1.5B NVIDIA 8192 $0.10 41.5
Arctic 1.5B Snowflake 32768 $0.15 43.2
StableLM 2 1.5B Stability AI 16384 $0.13 38.3
Pythia 8B EleutherAI 32768 $0.16 41.4
Molmo 1.5B Allen Institute for AI 8192 $0.21 42.8

Other benchmarks for StableLM 2 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 48.2 597 1th
GPQA Diamond 32.7 597 1th
SWE-bench Verified 19.4 597 1th
HumanEval 39.5 598 1th
MATH-500 34.3 599 1th
AIME 2025 24.8 595 1th
LiveCodeBench 22.2 597 1th
IFEval 50.8 598 1th
HellaSwag 59.4 597 1th
MMMU 39.8 595 1th
Arena Elo 1103.1 598 1th

FAQ

What score does StableLM 2 1.5B get on TruthfulQA?

StableLM 2 1.5B scores 49.8 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does StableLM 2 1.5B rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #593 of 600 models, in the 1st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is StableLM 2 1.5B good at TruthfulQA?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does StableLM 2 1.5B cost?

StableLM 2 1.5B costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.46 per million output tokens.

Related