Instruction following · Hugging Face

Zephyr on IFEval: score, rank and what it means

Zephyr scores 70.4 on IFEval, placing it #455 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Score
70.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#455
of 600
Percentile
24th
within the index
Benchmark avg
78.6
all models
Leader
96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
25.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on IFEval, with Zephyr highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 96.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.6
GPT-5.2 Max 95.2
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 95.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 94.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 94.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.5
o4 Reasoning 94.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
8 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5

What this score means

On IFEval, Zephyr sits at #455 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 25.7 points. The median model in this index scores 81.2, which puts Zephyr below the midpoint.

Hugging Face models average 64.6 on this benchmark. Zephyr is 5.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Hugging Face model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 77.0. Zephyr is 6.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.61 per million input tokens, Zephyr is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on IFEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Codestral 8B Mistral AI 4096 $1.18 59.0
GPT-NeoX Chat EleutherAI 16384 $1.49 60.1
Llama 3.3 Groq 8B Groq 16384 $1.17 59.5
Pythia EleutherAI 32768 $1.29 59.8
Zephyr Hugging Face 8192 $1.61 62.8
Zephyr Base Hugging Face 4096 $1.26 59.5
Llama 3.3 8B Meta AI 8192 $1.26 60.1

Other benchmarks for Zephyr

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 68.8 408 32th
GPQA Diamond 60.5 400 33th
SWE-bench Verified 50.3 419 30th
HumanEval 65.9 432 28th
MATH-500 65.3 418 30th
AIME 2025 55.1 415 31th
LiveCodeBench 48.7 460 23th
TruthfulQA 67.8 417 31th
HellaSwag 76.3 423 30th
MMMU 62.2 408 32th
Arena Elo 1303.0 414 31th

FAQ

What score does Zephyr get on IFEval?

Zephyr scores 70.4 on IFEval in this index. The benchmark average is 78.6 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Zephyr rank on IFEval?

It ranks #455 of 600 models, in the 24th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 96.1.

Is Zephyr good at IFEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the IFEval score calculated?

IFEval is a instruction following benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Zephyr cost?

Zephyr costs $1.61 per million input tokens and $6.84 per million output tokens.

Related