Preference · Fireworks AI

Firesearch Nano on Arena Elo: score, rank and what it means

Firesearch Nano scores 1229.9 on Arena Elo, placing it #526 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Score
1229.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#526
of 600
Percentile
12th
within the index
Benchmark avg
1349.9
all models
Leader
1501.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max
Gap to leader
272.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on Arena Elo, with Firesearch Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Max 1501.9
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 1500.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 1500.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 1497.5
GPT-5.2 Max 1495.3
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 1494.9
Grok 4 Max 1491.4
Claude Opus 4.5 1491.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 1490.0
Grok 4 Reasoning 1487.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
2 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
3 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
6 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
7 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
10 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8

What this score means

On Arena Elo, Firesearch Nano sits at #526 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Max, scores 1501.9, so the gap to the top is 272.0 points. The median model in this index scores 1373.8, which puts Firesearch Nano below the midpoint.

Fireworks AI models average 1333.5 on this benchmark. Firesearch Nano is 103.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Fireworks AI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 1332.0. Firesearch Nano is 102.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 1229.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $2.49 per million input tokens, Firesearch Nano is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on Arena Elo. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3 DeepInfra 7B DeepInfra 16384 $0.95 55.6
Llama 3 Baseten 7B Baseten 32768 $0.87 55.3
Embed 4 Mini Cohere 4096 $2.48 55.8
Mixtral Turbo 8B Together AI 4096 $0.75 54.1
Firesearch Nano Fireworks AI 8192 $2.49 55.6
Llama 3 Lambda 7B Lambda 8192 $0.84 55.4
Llama 4 Maverick 1.5B Meta AI 8192 $0.93 55.2

Other benchmarks for Firesearch Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 63.0 488 19th
GPQA Diamond 52.6 493 18th
SWE-bench Verified 40.0 521 13th
HumanEval 58.9 513 15th
MATH-500 52.9 533 11th
AIME 2025 45.7 492 18th
LiveCodeBench 41.5 529 12th
IFEval 66.5 509 15th
TruthfulQA 62.6 495 18th
HellaSwag 73.2 475 21th
MMMU 54.8 500 17th

FAQ

What score does Firesearch Nano get on Arena Elo?

Firesearch Nano scores 1229.9 on Arena Elo in this index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the top score is 1501.9.

How does Firesearch Nano rank on Arena Elo?

It ranks #526 of 600 models, in the 12th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Is Firesearch Nano good at Arena Elo?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the Arena Elo score calculated?

Arena Elo is a preference benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Firesearch Nano cost?

Firesearch Nano costs $2.49 per million input tokens and $11.16 per million output tokens.

Related