Multimodal · Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Nano on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

Gemini 3 Flash Nano scores 69.5 on MMMU, placing it #316 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
69.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#316
of 600
Percentile
47th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
17.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with Gemini 3 Flash Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, Gemini 3 Flash Nano sits at #316 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 17.4 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts Gemini 3 Flash Nano below the midpoint.

Google DeepMind models average 74.9 on this benchmark. Gemini 3 Flash Nano is 5.4 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Google DeepMind model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 65.0. Gemini 3 Flash Nano is 4.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.56 per million input tokens, Gemini 3 Flash Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.3 Base Meta AI 32768 $3.63 74.0
Reka Core Mini Reka AI 8192 $7.48 70.1
Auto OpenRouter 32768 $7.53 70.2
Command R+ Base Cohere 65536 $3.24 71.6
Gemini 3 Flash Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.56 69.4
Llama 3 Modal Chat Modal 65536 $3.55 73.3
Nova Lite Max Amazon 200000 $9.79 73.4

Other benchmarks for Gemini 3 Flash Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 71.4 386 36th
GPQA Diamond 62.9 384 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.7 379 37th
HumanEval 73.0 372 38th
MATH-500 75.0 323 46th
AIME 2025 62.9 365 39th
LiveCodeBench 60.3 364 39th
IFEval 77.5 371 38th
TruthfulQA 72.0 379 37th
HellaSwag 83.4 308 49th
Arena Elo 1348.8 367 39th

FAQ

What score does Gemini 3 Flash Nano get on MMMU?

Gemini 3 Flash Nano scores 69.5 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does Gemini 3 Flash Nano rank on MMMU?

It ranks #316 of 600 models, in the 47th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Nano good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Gemini 3 Flash Nano cost?

Gemini 3 Flash Nano costs $7.56 per million input tokens and $41.55 per million output tokens.

Related